raelian movement logo_White

Honey no healthier than corn syrup, says honey-funded study

首页 > 雷尔> 雷尔评论

RAEL’S COMMENT:
Sugar is sugar… and used without excess, it’s delicious!

 

Here’s interesting news for those of us who are trying to cut down on sugar, and have a hope, perhaps, that substituting more “natural” sweeteners like honey will be a healthier fix for our sweet tooth. Science says, not so fast. A new study shows very little, if any, difference between honey and high-fructose sweeteners.

And before you cock an eyebrow, dubious as to whether this is one more study funded by Big Sugar, know that this research by the USDA was actually partially funded by the National Honey Board.

The goal of this small study was to see how three types of sweeteners affected test subjects:

The researchers gave subjects daily doses of each of three sweeteners — honey, cane sugar, and high-fructose corn sweetener — for two weeks at a time. They then compared measures of blood sugar, insulin, body weight, cholesterol, and blood pressure in the 55 subjects.

The researchers found that the three sweeteners basically have the same impacts. Most measures were unchanged by the sweeteners. One measure of a key blood fat, a marker for heart disease, rose with all three.

You can see the study itself here: Consumption of Honey, Sucrose, and High-Fructose Corn Syrup Produces Similar Metabolic Effects in Glucose-Tolerant and -Intolerant Individuals

It’s an interesting case that pits the perception of “natural” against the actual chemical makeup of these sweeteners, which are actually chemically “very, very similar,” as one of the researchers says.

https://www.thekitchn.com/honey-no-healthier-than-corn-syrup-says-honey-funded-study-223752

获得真相

阅读我们的创作者在1973年与雷尔(Rael)的UFO会面中给我们的信息!

其他活动

关注我们

雷尔研习会

您可能还会喜欢

这个行星没有必要被“拯救”

雷尔评论: 这个行星没有必要被“拯救”。 需要拯救 …

宇宙是无限的

雷尔评论: 这意味着感受到你是无限的,就像宇宙是无 …

如果法国总统马克龙足够聪明……

雷尔评论: 如果马克龙足够聪明…… 想象一下! 首 …

Humanity: Chances of survival

RAEL’S COMMENT: Goo …