Attempt to prosecute Assad at ICC is aimed at undermining Syrian peace process

RAEL’S COMMENT:
The US pushes for this while denying the same ICC the right to check the US military for war crimes in Afghanistan… double standard at it’s worst proving again that the ICC is just a tool for US imperialism.

 

Historian John Laughland explains why the International Criminal Court’s attempt to indict President Assad of Syria reveals its dictatorial and warmongering tendencies.

The announcement that “a group of Syrian refugees and their London lawyers” have found “a neat legal trick” to press for an indictment against Syrian President Bashar Assad by the International Criminal Court demonstrates, yet again, the dangerous corruption of international justice, against which I have been warning for over a decade.

The Syrian war is nearly over, thanks to the military successes of the Syrian army and its Russian and Iranian allies. Exhaustion on both sides has probably helped. Diplomatic overtures have started to re-integrate Syria into the international system, starting at the regional level: the United Arab Emirates have re-opened their embassy in Damascus; the Sudanese president, Assad’s near namesake, Omar Al-Bashir, has visited Syria, as have senior Egyptian officials; Syrian officials have attended pan-Arab summits; even Israel is maintaining its dialogue with Russia over Syria. In short, the situation is being slowly normalised as Syria herself embarks on the painful search for internal peace.

The attempt to get Assad prosecuted is an attempt to stamp out these seedlings of peace before they take root. Any prosecution against Assad would scupper, or at least severely damage, this slow acceptance that the Syrian president is part of the solution. When even the British government has accepted that Assad is here to stay, and that peace must be made with him, his implacable enemies fear that their prize is about to slip out of their grasp. They do not want peace, if that means keeping Assad.

We know that the goal is to sabotage any peace process because this kind of indictment is old hat in international criminal law. At the end of the Bosnian Civil War in 1995, indictments were issued against the Bosnian Serb leaders, especially Radovan Karadzic, specifically in order to remove them from the Dayton peace talks. Antonio Cassese, then president of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, said in 1995, just after the indictment was issued against Karadzic, that it had been issued for that reason: “The indictment means that these gentlemen will not be able to participate in peace negotiations” (quoted in the Italian daily L’Unità, 26 July 1995). Incidentally, Cassese had himself encouraged the prosecutor to bring these prosecutions even though he, as a judge and president of the tribunal, was supposed to be neutral.

 

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/454127-icc-war-crimes-assad/?fbclid=IwAR1_5-iAhRq1lOxnZeK8kjCI8KaXXsrsXcza46xySIeyMxvcP5PKuxjveuE

Get the truth

Read the messages given to us by our creators during Rael’s UFO encounter in 1973! 

Other events

Follow Us

Rael Academy

you might also like

The brain may be able to repair itself

RAEL’S COMMENT:  So much time lost in regulation, authorization…. while a poison vaccine killing thousands of people is immediately authorized…

Ex-Louvre director faces criminal charges

RAEL’S COMMENT:  Europe always ready to pillage Africa…

India decriminalizes sex work

RAEL’S COMMENT:  Wonderful!

Cancer patients seek damages from Fukushima operator

RAEL’S COMMENT:  It’s just the beginning…